Through Dignity, Learning, and Awareness
Questions or comments please Send Email
To recognize that there is
extensive human
conflict, misery, and
suffering everywhere in the world
is uncontroversial. Humanity has a
several-thousand year intellectual
tradition out of which much
discourse, written history, and technical advances have emerged. Yet
despite
thousands of
years to have had the benefit of
to learn in, the one
thing we seem
incapable of learning is to
co-exist in ways that
support and affirm life - in
a state of Peace.
On
Dec 10, 1948 - three years after the end of World War II, the recently formed United
Nations
(formerly the League of Nations) adopted the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights
as an integral
element of the International
Bill of Rights - instruments
of the Charter of
the United Nations.
While it is
good to proclaim the dignity,
worth, and rights of, and on
behalf
of individuals, we might
observe in
the ensuing years since the
adoption
of the Universal
Declaration of Human
Rights that
while there is a more
humane consciousness in the
world, that there
is equally enough
conflict and
human misery currently to
suggest that
the notion of proclaiming
rights requires further insight,
support, and
understanding to
augment
a human and humane consciousness
through
the aware-
ness of
individual, and by extension, universal responsibility for thought and action.
It seems that it is both useful and timely to inform humanity that all
people have a responsibility to
all humanity - in conjunction with
their human rights. Hence
this, a proposed addendum to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights entitled the Universal Declaration of Human
Responsibilities,
and the hope we can begin building a bridge for Peace in the
only place it
can
ever be: The human
mind.

If we examine the
plethora of discourses produced
by humanity, we find that throughout history there is
a tendency to
condemn
behaviours and actions which harm humanity.
If it were not for these
discourses
(laws, morals, ethics, treaties, human rights etc.) we might presume
that
the propensity for violence by people against people is a usual, and
in
that sense a normal and
acceptable part
of human existence.
But our
discourses do inform us that there is a healthier and more life
supporting conception of humanity
and human relations to respect and
adhere to – by the
simple fact of their existence at all.

Universal Declaration of
Human Responsibilities
A proposed addendum to:
The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights
United Nations
The International Bill
of Human Rights
10
December, 1948

UNIVERSAL
DECLARATION OF
HUMAN RESPONSIBILITIES
1999

Article 1
All human beings are born free and with full rights to life and all that is necessary to the maintenance
of life, and will understand that in
sustaining their own life will bear the responsibility of ensuring
that they understand that the same force compelling their own life is alive in every person also, and
to conduct themselves in respect of that
knowledge, and in recognition and respect of the life of
every person.
Article 2
All people bear the responsibility to actively seek to recognize the
fundamental humanity of all
people, in all places, and at all times. All people must
understand that such active participation in
the interest of humanity ensures their own place, safety, and trust in
a social world. Trust, decency
and the desire for safety are
rightly the generally universal human experience.
Article 3
For all people in the world to exist in safety from other people
requires that in all instances of conflict
people are bound by the responsibility to their own, and to
every
other person's right to life to
engage, where possible, in the act of exploring
alternative means to resolve the conflicts present,
until such time as each
conflict is prevented or
resolved peacefully to the greatest benefit and
satisfaction of all
humanity.
Article 4
All people are, and will be responsible for the public trust
insofar as that all people have the
fundamental human right to exist unmolested, and to that end must
exercise the most just solutions
to human conflict, ignorance, or suffering whenever and wherever a
solution is wanted or needed. It
is in this way that humanity will eventually come to learn that no person
is above nor exempt from the
responsibility for just action, and for the highest forms of justice to
prevail
in all life.
Article 5
(1) It is the responsibility of all people to provide or to seek
as necessary guidance free of
ambiguity, free of hypocrisy, and free of any self-serving bias
which may harm humanity, or which
under scrutiny can be shown to be false or negates life.
(2) It is therefore the responsibility of every individual to
seek wise guidance, and to actively,
honestly, and critically think through the implied consequences
of the yield of any such guidance
given or received in order to learn to judge for themselves, and
thereby ensure a self-determined and
autonomous knowledge of what constitutes wisdom and justice, and hence
to discern what will or
will not be to the benefit of all humanity. Therefore, it is a
responsibility to think for oneself.
Article 6
(1) Wise guidance is
desirable when the bias is serving one’s own healthy
self-interest in belonging
to our greater
humanity. In this
sense
the self-interest is known to be a healthy and
positive self-
interest wherein
all humanity is the
beneficiary and identical with the interests
of humanity at large.
(2) It is therefore the responsibility of all people to aspire
and adhere to the authority of wisdom and
all autonomous and healthy understandings of things human, and to aver from
accepting
illegitimate
authority where there can be negative consequences for humanity either
individually or on the whole.
Article 7
(1) It is the responsibility of every person to support and
observe just laws where just laws exist for
the benefit of humanity, until such time as no laws are deemed
necessary.
(2) It is the responsibility of every person to refuse and resist
unjust
laws as they can wherever
unjust laws are
imposed upon
humanity, to the fullest extent of their ability to do so.
Article 8
Every person will, through the responsible striving to understand their
own
humanity, learn and
exercise the higher thrusts of life: hope, compassion, charity, trust,
kindness, and Peace in the
humane and humanitarian tradition, and will henceforth strive to pass
such understanding on
to others.
Article 9
Every person will strive to understand that in every case seeking the
best for other members of the
human species is ultimately in humane terms identical with
seeking the
best for oneself.
Article 10
(1) Every person will seek education, wherever possible, of a
kind which develops their greatest
human potentials, insofar as that such education will conform to its
precept “to lead out.”
(2) An understanding of responsibility in regards to any
education will require that all persons
will engage only in educational pursuits and practices which can clearly be
shown to enhance life,
healthy emotional development, friendship, and good will to be directed
to others. When all
humanity is engaged thus, conflict abates amongst individuals and across
groups.
Article 11
Every person will recognize that their own fundamental humanity, and by
extension,
that the fact of
the essential fundamental humanity of all humanity, is of greater
importance than any particular
belief or religion or doctrine. Moreover, by extension, people will understand
that
the process of
creating beliefs, religions, and doctrines is a process and function of humanity
common
to all
humanity, and that the individual beliefs do not admit nor
allow any person to disregard the funda-
mental
humanity of any person or group
or persons.
Article 12
Every person should carefully examine all communications, directives,
and motivations to belief or
to action in order to ensure that all the intentions, actions, and
outcomes of such compelling efforts
will serve the best interest of all humanity, in both the short term and the
long
term.
Article 13
(1) Every person will engage in or support the responsible and
scrupulous evaluation of all existing
documents, constitutions, legislation, charters, and other forms
of human discourse guiding or
regulating human life and action, to ensure that such bodies of work
ultimately serve the humane
interests of all humanity equally and without
discrimination.
(2) All social constructs guiding or regulating human life and action
will be continuously
re-evaluated to ensure that the emerging broader global humanitarian
social consciousness is
reflected in those works. Inclusions which are outdated or are no
longer useful or relevant in a
contemporary context reflecting a developing humane consciousness will
be removed through a
due and responsible process, in the interest of all humanity.
Article 14
No person will deny their responsibility to discover, to experience,
and to advance any or all of that
which can be considered to properly be the responsibility of humanity
to humanity. In that each
person will strive to assure the best of humanity through responsible
action and experience, they are
participating in humanity realizing itself in the most enlightened
sense.
Article 15
Every person should independently exercise their own powers of critical
judgment,
just thought,
conceptions of unassailable truths, and should ultimately come to their
own
understanding of how
best to understand the concept of responsibility itself in the social
context,
Article 16
Every person, if having found any of the foregoing to be sound,
practical, and life supporting, will
therefore have recognized their own fundamental humanity in some
measure, and in that sense will
then recognize that they properly belong to the greater human
family.
Article 17
Every person is bound by individual responsibility to examine, analyze,
and
assess all the principles
and premises contained in this statement of The Universal Declaration
of Human Responsibilities to
critically test the value for their selves, and for all humanity.
Article 18
Every person, if having found the foregoing Universal Declaration
of Human Responsibilities to
have passed the rigours prescribed within it, must on their own
responsibility consider, augment,
elucidate, and contribute any of their expanded conceptions and understandings to
others, to the
benefit of all humanity, for the love of humanity, and for life itself.

It is an unassailable truth that all humanity is fundamentally the
same.
Skin colour, languages, beliefs, nationalities, and so on – these are secondary measures of our
humanity.
Our primary measure is that we are all of the same species: we all have skin, experience
emotion,
we all possess the capacity for language, for beliefs of any kind, and we share in common our
craving for life.
We do not merely believe, then, but rather we know that all humanity is the same
in a
fundamental
sense.
And so, we must stand and speak for all humanity in the most humane and
humanitarian
sense.
To think otherwise is only to display poor habits of thought, and to go
against life itself.
Consider that if in any case one argues against the humanity of another person, they are
automatically
arguing against their own self and life, since their humanity is identical to that
of
all other peoples.
To argue against any of humanity and by extension oneself constitutes both a theoretical
and
practical impossibility: it is to eclipse one’s self.
Conversely, if in every instance people
argue
for humanity, they automatically argue for themselves
since they are that humanity, and they are
therefore in unity with themselves.
When both sides of the argument are understood, the conflict or
argumentation conflates, and
simply disappears leaving no argument at all - only our humanity, and true
Peace.
The content on this site has
not been offered to, approved of, nor accepted by the United Nations.
For more information please refer to Article 7 at the following URL:
